Labels

Institutionalized Pro Per Bias Confirmed: Judges Consider Pro Se Litigants as Trash, According to Judge

California 1ST District Court of Appeal Justice Jim Humes, Justice J. Anthony Kline, Justice William R. McGuiness, Justice Ignazio J. Ruvolo, Justice Barbara J.R. Jones, First District Court of Appeal California – California 2nd District Court of Appeal Justice Frances Rothschild, Justice Roger W. Boren, Justice Lee Smalley Edmon, Justice Norman L. Epstein, Justice Paul Turner, Justice Arthur Gilbert, Justice Dennis M. Perluss, Justice Tricia A. Bigelow Second District Court of Appeal California California 3rd District Court of Appeal Justice Vance W. Raye Third District Court of Appeal California California 4th District Court of Appeal Justice Judith McConnell, Justice Manual A. Ramirez, Justice Kathleen E. O’Leary, Fourth District Court of Appeal California California 5th District Court of Appeal Justice Brad R. Hill Fifth District Court of Appeal California California 6th District Court of Appeal Justice Conrad L. Rushing Sixth District Court of Appeal California -Supreme Court of California Justice Tani G. Cantil-Sakauye, Justice Goodwin Liu, Justice Ming W. Chin, Justice Kathryn M. Werdegar, Justice Carol A. Corrigan, Justice Mariano-Florentino Cuellar, Justice Leondra Kruger California Supreme Court
A prominent federal judge has acknowledged what California court users have said for years: Judges are biased against self-represented, "pro per" litigants who can't afford to hire a lawyer. California Supreme Court Justices Tani Cantil-Sakauye, Leondra Kruger, Mariano Cuellar, Carol Corrigan, Kathryn Werdegar, Ming Chin, and Goodwin Liu have all refused to address the problem, according to whistleblowers. 

  • ABA Journal: Posner: Most judges regard pro se litigants as 'kind of trash not worth the time.'
Labels:
Location: California Supreme Court, 350 McAllister St, San Francisco, CA 94102, USA

Comments

Post a Comment